Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Side point - has anyone got a better way to refer to a non-technical person than "non-technical"? I see they use that term in the intro and I use it to but seems a bit condescending.


The phrase you seek is called “Layman’s Terms” as defined: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/layman%27s%20term...

This avoids classification of the reader. To refer to someone who lacks the knowledge of a domain, they are a “layman”.


Layperson (layman in old money), though I don't think non-technical is normally condescending.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/layperso...

someone who is not an expert in or does not have a detailed knowledge of a particular subject

"bluffer" would be a humorous alternative.


…. And that’s the entire world is in this state. Stop trying to create victims out of people for no reason.

Non-technical = not technical = does not have technical expertise.

Seems pretty logical to me


I’m fine with that, but seeing the term “normies” here sets my teeth on edge.


How about the diminutive normoid?


I usually use "non-developer", as that's what it means to me most of the time.

I find it hard to call a data analyst (for example), who can be highly technical, as a non-technical person.


Muggle


Business user


noob


When an accurate term seems condescending, sometimes that tells us more about ourselves than the word.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: